Service II
Consulting
A clear answer on whether dynamic causality fits a problem, before the client commits to building.
- The outcome
- A written assessment the client can act on. The Center examines a problem, an existing causal or safety model, or a planned DeepCausality integration. The report states whether dynamic causality fits, where the current approach holds and breaks, what a solution would require, and what it would not deliver. Engagements range from feasibility studies to reviews of causal models, safety arguments, and system architectures.
- The evidence
- The author of DeepCausality writes the assessment. The Linux Foundation has hosted DeepCausality since 2023, and ServiceRadar, an open-source network monitoring platform, uses it as a component. The Center reports findings at the strength the evidence supports.
- Time to first result
- Each assessment has a fixed scope and term; the report arrives two to four weeks after the Center receives the material. The client can decide before committing a development budget.
- How to start?
- Consulting suits an organization weighing dynamic causality for a problem, or needing an independent review of a causal or safety model. It requires documentation, code, or sample data. A scoping call frames the question and confirms that the material supports an assessment; a second meeting reviews the findings.
Starting an engagement
The client describes the problem in a few lines, and the Center replies to arrange the first call. Client data and client-specific results stay with the client; verified general methods return to the open DeepCausality project.